TODO
At 28C3
The great time/duration vs. range argument:Specify ranges as (start, stop) or (start, length)?Specify ranges in number of samples or in picoseconds, or both?
We will have an extra datafeed type SR_DF_LOGIC_INDEXED, which contains [samplenumber, sample] instead of just raw samples. Samplenumber is a uint64_t, and sample is unchanged (unitsize). Frontends must be able to handle both, and modular filters in libsigrok or the sampling filter in libsigrokdecode may convert from SR_DF_LOGIC to SR_DF_LOGIC_INDEXED at any time.
PD API: finalize naming conventionstart/decode/put/config/add as method names- ANT8/18e unified driver
- Figure out how to upload a firmware/bitstream.
- Figure out how to start an acquisition (with certain samplerate and trigger settings etc).
- Write an initial driver.
Change libsigrokdecode to use and require Python >= 3.0.Use the new API calls for C/Python interaction.- Use 'bytes' and/or 'memoryview' and the new Python 3 buffer API.
- PD performance:
- How to pass (and what exactly, and in which format) samples and already decoded protocol packets
- From C to Python (i.e. from libsigrokdecode/controller to the lowest-level decoder)
- From Python to Python (i.e., from one decoder to the next in the stack)
- From Python to C (i.e., from a decoder back to libsigrokdecode, which then hands it over to the CLI/GUI, which write it to file or display it in the GUI).
- Various options: TODO
Processing raw logic vs. everything else up the stack: (optionally) deliver pre-sampled by clock or rate?
- How to pass (and what exactly, and in which format) samples and already decoded protocol packets
Yes, the controller will deliver a clock- or rate-sampled feed instead, if the PD requests this via a configuration option.
- Other PD issues:
Many decoders can output data in various formats (ASCII, hex, BCD, MSB-first vs. LSB-first and many more). In addition, in some decoders there can be various fields which contain data of various lengths (6bits, 8bits, 9bits, 32bits, other). Each of these fields can have a different "sane" default display format (BCD for e.g. "minutes" data coming from an RTC, hex for device ID of an SPI flash chip, ASCII for UART data that is human-readable, and many many more). Should the decoder data output format(s) be decoder options or a GUI/frontend features?- Decoder option:
- Pro: Only the decoder itself knows which fields mean what, which "sane"/"native" display format makes sense for each field of data.
Con: Requires a full (or partial) re-decode if the GUI wants to switch from ASCII to hex for example.
- Frontend feature:
Con: Every frontend needs to re-implement this feature.Con: GUI needs inside knowlegde and special-casing for every PD (very bad!).
- Both:
- Every decoder has its own options to control the display format of data; additionally
Other:Always pass the raw data as integer value (up to 64 bits, but what if a decoder needs bigger structures? pass a list? tuples? other?); In addition the decoder also passes another data field for each integer value, which is a string containing the same value in the user-configured output format.
- Decoder option:
The PD start() function should return metadata about the SRD_OUTPUT_ANNOTATION data formats it can submit back to SRD, in the form of a list: [ ["7-bit shifted hex", "Read/Write bit shifted out from the 8-bit i2c slave address"], ["7-bit shifted hex", ...] ]. The first option is the default way in which the frontend will display an item of data; the other formats will be available to use as an option by the user. This metadata is independent of type: strings, hex-formatted numeric data, etc. The data submitted by the PD for output streams of type SRD_OUTPUT_ANNOTATION while decoding will have index values indicating which data format that item is: [[0, '0x10'], [1, '0x20']]
sigrok 0.3
- stackable protocol decoder implementation
accept PD options on commandline: -a i2c:foo=bar- enforce input/output options in PDs: don't send logic if PD only accepts i2c etc.
- free all instances at end of session
proper python exception handling in libsrd: output only error message with srd_err(), and full traceback with srd_dbg()Bugfix: The input of decode() is in the form [samplenum, (probe1, probe2, ...)], but samplenum is a relative number (in an input chunk), not the absolute sample number.- Annotations need an additional 'type' field, so that PDs/GUIs can differentiate between different output "things".
- Types are not yet defined, but could be things like DEFAULT, ERR, WARN, DBG, and others.
The assignment of probes to the input probes a PD wants to get via decode() is not handled correctly, yet. If an .sr file has 7 probes defined/enabled, and this file is passed to the I2C PD for example, it will fail, as that PD only expects 2 input probes (SCL, SDA). The srd code should make sure only those two probes are passed to the PD.Additionally, the selection of which probe to pass in as SCL, and which one to pass as SDA must be user-selectable (in srd, and in the UIs).
PD config options (baudrate, clock_polarity, etc.) cannot be set/passed from any UI, yet. The PDs have defaults, but those cannot be overridden by the user, yet.- Test/implement support for multiple outputs of one PD, and stacking different additional PDs on those outputs.
- Test/implement multiple inputs support.
- CLI: Support for printing/selecting a specific annotation for output (or multiple).
- APIs:
- PDs: Change extra_probes to optional_probes (or a shorter name for that).
- srd: All public functions/names must have srd_ prefix.
- all libs: Add good Doxygen documentation, validate/review APIs, etc. etc.
- change all code to start counting probes at 0, not 1.
- Get rid of the use of manual polling of FDs, which is not portable (doesn't work on Windows). Use g_poll() instead (which spawns a new thread on Windows).
Mac OS X: B460800 is not available it seems. Find the correct header (if any) and/or find a (possibly platform-specific) workaround, or drop this on Mac OS X.- Add a --start-sampling (TODO: Better name?) option, which just starts sampling with the supplied or default samplerate. Contrary to --time or --samples you don't need to explicitly specify a duration or number of samples here, that's automatically determined by the available memory of the logic analyzer and the selected samplerate.
- TODO: Similar to --continuous? Merge both?
Make sure all combinations of --enable-*/--disable-* options works for configure.There may be issue if none of the drivers is enabled, print useful error in that case(?)
- libsigrok.h/libsigrokdecode.h: Only list public API functions.
- Windows port:
- Implement anykey.c replacement.
- hex output: Not all lines/columns are of the same length (as they are with real LAs).
- VCD: All samplenumbers are 0 (instead of the proper samplecount).
- OLS, gnuplot: Hangs on MinGW for some reasons (not sure if related).
Finish protocol decoder API design.- CLI: Eliminate all printing to stdout, only sample data or decoder output should end up there. Error/debug messages should go to stderr always.
- Run the code receiving the samples as quickly as possible, run output format code and other non-timing-critical stuff (protocol decoders) in an extra thread. The problem is nicely visible with FX2-based logic analyzers, the longer an output format takes to produce its output, the better your chances to get "oops, I just lost samples" errors.
- Hardware drivers: Make specification of triggering capabilities more detailed, so that frontends/GUIs can auto-generate GUI forms out of that metadata.
sigrok 0.4
- modular filter system
- take arguments in the regular thing:key=value format
- integrate current probe compression filter
- resampling module: sample up/down based on factor argument
- noise filter: filter out pulses shorter than the samplerate's period
- Finish fx2lafw (open-source FX2 firmware).
- Factor out input/output file formats to libsigrokfile.
Before 1.0
- all output modules should use GString API instead of estimating output size
- VCD input modules
- OLS format input module
Future
- udev:
- Make udev optional, only build MSO driver if it's available
- have OLS driver use udev if available, fall back to serial port probing otherwise
- Find alternative to udev for windows and macos
- Fix/workaround libusb 1.0 Windows port issues:
- Device renumeration not yet supported (needed for FX2 based LAs)
- File descriptor / socket based polling not supported in Windows. Workaround (short-term): Use a thread in sigrok.
- Make sure all optional components are really optional in the build system:
- Only require Python if the users wants protocol decoders, the rest should also build/compile/run fine without Python installed.
- sigrok uses uint64_t as an internal datatype to represent a sample, limiting the number of probes on supported hardware to 64. But high-end logic analyzers can have hundreds of probes. A solution would be to switch to either a roll-our-own byte array type, or use GMP. In any case, the overhead of switching over shouldn't be too bad: the filter code and frontend datafeed callback functions will need to use it, but hardware drivers should have enough with a couple of lightweight wrappers.
- sr_errno:
- Most functions should return SR_OK or SR_ERR_* (same for SRD_OK etc).
- Most backend functions return status as an integer, which is SR_OK if all went well, or SR_ERR_* and similar if an error occurred.
- However there is no way to pass any information back as to what went wrong — and this is important for user-friendliness.
- Perhaps an error code is not enough; maybe something like sigrok_errno(errorcode, "unsupported device") is better.
- Clean up device-specific globals in hardware drivers, to properly permit multiple devices per driver:
asix-sigma,demo(not relevant),link-mso19,openbench-logic-sniffer, saleae-logic, zeroplus-logic-cube - Python bindings for libsigrok and libsigrokdecode.
Contributors wanted
- Add output for latex package tikz-timing.
- Add output for browser waveform viewer/editor written in javascript/JSON called WaveDrom.
- Linux distro packages for non-Debian distros.
- FreeBSD packages/ports.