Difference between revisions of "Talk:Input output formats"

From sigrok
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'One of the logic analyzer input formats that might be worth supporting is the [http://www.sump.org/projects/analyzer/client/ SUMP output format] which appears to be undocumented …')
 
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
One of the logic analyzer input formats that might be worth supporting is the [http://www.sump.org/projects/analyzer/client/ SUMP output format] which appears to be undocumented at this point.  It would be useful to people who transition from using the SUMP client software to Sigrok.
== SUMP Output format ==


[[User:Rct|Rct]] 15:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
One of the logic analyzer input formats that might be worth supporting is the [http://www.sump.org/projects/analyzer/client/ SUMP output format] which appears to be undocumented at this point.  It would be useful to people who transition from using the SUMP client software to Sigrok. --[[User:Rct|Rct]] 15:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 
: Yeah, sounds like a good idea. I'll look into the protocol/format and try to write such an output module. Thanks for the hint! --[[User:Uwe Hermann|Uwe Hermann]] 21:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:34, 22 April 2010

SUMP Output format

One of the logic analyzer input formats that might be worth supporting is the SUMP output format which appears to be undocumented at this point. It would be useful to people who transition from using the SUMP client software to Sigrok. --Rct 15:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, sounds like a good idea. I'll look into the protocol/format and try to write such an output module. Thanks for the hint! --Uwe Hermann 21:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)