Difference between revisions of "Talk:High precision analog"

From sigrok
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I can't understand the first proposal, can the author provide us with examples please? I don know if you are thinking what I am thinking. I'm thinking about a solution along...")
 
m (Corrected formatting -sorry!)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I can't understand the first proposal, can the author provide us with examples please? I don know if you are thinking what I am thinking.
I can't understand the first proposal, can the author provide us with examples please? I don know if you are thinking what I am thinking.


I'm thinking about a solution along the lines of a BCD value, with around 10 digits of precision (the highest resolution multimeters in existance have 8 and a half digits of resolution), with a base 10 exponent. Math is possible, but slower than normal and for complex operations, a conversion to floating point might be convenient.
I'm thinking about a solution along the lines of a BCD value, with around 10 digits of precision (the highest resolution multimeters in existance have 8 and a half digits of resolution), with a base 10 exponent. Math is possible, but slower than normal and for complex operations, a conversion to floating point might be convenient.
[[User:Ivan747|Ivan747]] ([[User talk:Ivan747|talk]]) 04:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
[[User:Ivan747|Ivan747]] ([[User talk:Ivan747|talk]]) 04:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:07, 3 January 2015

I can't understand the first proposal, can the author provide us with examples please? I don know if you are thinking what I am thinking.

I'm thinking about a solution along the lines of a BCD value, with around 10 digits of precision (the highest resolution multimeters in existance have 8 and a half digits of resolution), with a base 10 exponent. Math is possible, but slower than normal and for complex operations, a conversion to floating point might be convenient. Ivan747 (talk) 04:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)