From 17869208b8cc79e1ff6bd003b9a64e1b6f07a140 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerhard Sittig Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 09:56:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] counter: emit wider annotations for data and word counts Track the start of a data or word cycle. Avoid narrow ss=es annotations which may be tedious to inspect by users in GUI applications. This resolves the issue initially reported in bug #1210. --- decoders/counter/pd.py | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/decoders/counter/pd.py b/decoders/counter/pd.py index 23cbd97..bb55fa7 100644 --- a/decoders/counter/pd.py +++ b/decoders/counter/pd.py @@ -87,20 +87,39 @@ class Decoder(srd.Decoder): condition.append({PIN_RESET: opt_edge_map[reset_edge]}) edge_count = 0 + edge_start = None word_count = 0 + word_start = None while True: self.wait(condition) now = self.samplenum if have_reset and self.matched[cond_reset]: edge_count = 0 + edge_start = now word_count = 0 + word_start = now self.putc(ROW_RESET, now, ['Word reset', 'Reset', 'Rst', 'R']) continue + # Implementation note: In the absence of a RESET condition + # before the first data edge, any arbitrary choice of where + # to start the annotation is valid. One may choose to emit a + # narrow annotation (where ss=es), or assume that the cycle + # which corresponds to the counter value started at sample + # number 0. We decided to go with the latter here, to avoid + # narrow annotations (see bug #1210). None of this matters in + # the presence of a RESET condition in the input stream. + if edge_start is None: + edge_start = 0 + if word_start is None: + word_start = 0 + edge_count += 1 - self.putc(ROW_EDGE, now, ["{:d}".format(edge_count)]) + self.putc(ROW_EDGE, edge_start, ["{:d}".format(edge_count)]) + edge_start = now if divider and (edge_count % divider) == 0: word_count += 1 - self.putc(ROW_WORD, now, ["{:d}".format(word_count)]) + self.putc(ROW_WORD, word_start, ["{:d}".format(word_count)]) + word_start = now -- 2.30.2