For small numbers range seems to be faster, and xramge is being removed
anyway in Python 3 AFAIK.
# Presets...
oldbyte = inbuf[0]
# Presets...
oldbyte = inbuf[0]
- for i in xrange(channels):
+ for i in range(channels):
oldbit[i] = (oldbyte & (1 << i)) != 0
# Loop over all samples.
oldbit[i] = (oldbyte & (1 << i)) != 0
# Loop over all samples.
# Optimization: Skip identical bytes (no transitions).
if oldbyte == s:
continue
# Optimization: Skip identical bytes (no transitions).
if oldbyte == s:
continue
- for i in xrange(channels):
+ for i in range(channels):
curbit = (s & (1 << i) != 0)
# Optimization: Skip identical bits (no transitions).
if oldbit[i] == curbit:
curbit = (s & (1 << i) != 0)
# Optimization: Skip identical bits (no transitions).
if oldbit[i] == curbit:
oldbit[i] = curbit
# Total number of transitions is the sum of rising and falling edges.
oldbit[i] = curbit
# Total number of transitions is the sum of rising and falling edges.
- for i in xrange(channels):
+ for i in range(channels):
transitions[i] = rising[i] + falling[i]
outbuf += "Rising edges: "
transitions[i] = rising[i] + falling[i]
outbuf += "Rising edges: "
- for i in xrange(channels):
+ for i in range(channels):
outbuf += str(rising[i]) + " "
outbuf += "\nFalling edges: "
outbuf += str(rising[i]) + " "
outbuf += "\nFalling edges: "
- for i in xrange(channels):
+ for i in range(channels):
outbuf += str(falling[i]) + " "
outbuf += "\nTransitions: "
outbuf += str(falling[i]) + " "
outbuf += "\nTransitions: "
- for i in xrange(channels):
+ for i in range(channels):
outbuf += str(transitions[i]) + " "
outbuf += "\n"
outbuf += str(transitions[i]) + " "
outbuf += "\n"