From 004fd9ffd3d3aa802a7ac94367e627b06b1b8aea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Soeren Apel Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 23:17:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Amend #119 to use vector instead of tuple This way, we don't need to bump glibmm to 2.54, which we otherwise would --- bindings/python/sigrok/core/classes.i | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/bindings/python/sigrok/core/classes.i b/bindings/python/sigrok/core/classes.i index 94913d0f..eb557d03 100644 --- a/bindings/python/sigrok/core/classes.i +++ b/bindings/python/sigrok/core/classes.i @@ -344,8 +344,8 @@ Glib::VariantBase python_to_variant_by_key(PyObject *input, const sigrok::Config PyObject *numObj = PyTuple_GetItem(input, 0); PyObject *denomObj = PyTuple_GetItem(input, 1); if ((PyInt_Check(numObj) || PyLong_Check(numObj)) && (PyInt_Check(denomObj) || PyLong_Check(denomObj))) { - std::tuple tpl = {PyInt_AsLong(numObj), PyInt_AsLong(denomObj)}; - return Glib::Variant< std::tuple >::Variant::create(tpl); + const std::vector v = {(guint64)PyInt_AsLong(numObj), (guint64)PyInt_AsLong(denomObj)}; + return Glib::Variant< std::vector >::create(v); } } throw sigrok::Error(SR_ERR_ARG); -- 2.30.2